Malfunction: The Dressing Down of Janet Jackson focuses on the infamous incident in 2004, the place Timberlake ripped away a part of Jackson’s costume and quickly uncovered her breast. It premiered final evening (19 November) on US channel FX, and was produced by the New York Times.
While each musicians apologised on the time, the fallout from the Super Bowl led to the stalling of Jackson’s profession – from which she by no means totally recovered – whereas Timberlake was in a position to proceed unscathed. He was allowed to carry out on the Grammys, the place he received Best Male Pop Vocal Performance, whereas Jackson was barred.
“Justin Timberlake – the man who pulled open Jackson’s costume and feigned ignorance in the aftermath – fled the scene, career intact,” Adam White observed in The Independent, in an article about the documentary. “Jackson, her breast identified as a valuable distraction from the fledgling Iraq war, was ruined.”
“Between Britney and Janet, Justin once skated through controversies that had grievous PR effects on the women around him,” an article in Slate mentioned. “Fortified by his undeniable musical talent – and make no mistake, he is one of the greatest performers of recent history – Timberlake’s boy-next-door identity endured for decades, even in the face of evidence that contradicted it.
“The new reckoning around him feels like a cultural exorcism, a chance to use the boy band vessel to purge ourselves of the evils he now represents to many…. Timberlake has become the perfect emblem of a bygone era that rewarded guys exactly like him—until it didn’t.”
A overview in The Daily Beast mentioned the documentary “torches” Timberlake’s “s****y behaviour” and in contrast it to Framing Britney Spears, which explored the best way the pop star’s conservatorship battle and the best way she was handled by the media throughout the top of her fame.
“Framing Britney Spears… portrayed how the Nsync breakout star used the media apparatus and our society’s default to misogyny to ruin Spears’ reputation and, in turn, elevate his career,” it mentioned.
“He slut-shamed a person with whom he had sexual history and parlayed the points “scored” from being together with her, a scorching and well-known girl who was rumoured to be a virgin, into each sympathy factors after a breakup and cool-dude fistbumps for his conquest, all to assist his rise within the business. Meanwhile, we have been beatboxing alongside to his fool music like giddy accomplices.”
Enjoy limitless entry to 70 million ad-free songs and podcasts with Amazon Music Sign up now for a 30-day free trial
The Independent has contacted Timberlake’s consultant for remark.
Timberlake previously responded to the “reckoning” surrounding his behaviour following the discharge of Framing Britney Spears.
“I’ve seen the messages, tags, comments, and concerns and I want to respond. I am deeply sorry for the times in my life where my actions contributed to the problem, where I spoke out of turn, or did not speak up for what was right,” he mentioned in an Instagram post earlier this 12 months.
“I understand that I fell short in these moments and in many others and benefited from a system that condones misogyny and racism.”
“I also feel compelled to respond, in part, because everyone involved deserves better and most importantly because this is a larger conversation that I wholeheartedly want to be part of and grow from,” he continued.
“The industry is flawed. It sets men, especially white men, up for success. It’s designed this way. As a man in a privileged position, I have to be vocal about this. Because of my ignorance, I didn’t recognise it for all that it was while it was happening in my own life but I do not want to ever benefit from others being pulled down again.”
In the publish he wrote, “I specifically want to apologise to Britney Spears and Janet Jackson both individually, because I care for and respect those women and I know I failed.”